|
|
|
|
Business Relationship On
The Rocks?
Plan Ahead To Avoid Liability
by Craig Milsten
|
| |
| |
Trust, respect and a shared vision are standard prerequisites
among business partners but these lofty ideals sometimes get
lost in the course of business. Deadlocks and other conflicts
may occur amongst shareholders and partners, leading to an eventual
breakup of the corporation or partnership and causing the shareholders
or partners to explore new business opportunities. These new
opportunities might involve a venture in competition with the
current company. Such an undertaking is fraught with danger and
the likelihood of litigation looms if one disregards the law.
Planning ahead and playing by the rules can help a savvy business
person avoid a lawsuit.
Step One: Know the Fiduciary Duties of Directors, Partners
and Employees.
The first term with which to become familiar
is "fiduciary duty." A
fiduciary duty is essentially a duty of loyalty or a duty to
act fairly. Every director of a corporation owes a fiduciary
duty to the company and every partner owes a fiduciary duty to
his or her partners. Employees owe a duty of loyalty to their
employers. While an employee's duty of loyalty is not exactly
the same as a director's (or a partner's) fiduciary duty, some
common scenarios occur when a business divorce is imminent. For
example, both an employee and a director or partner owe the company
a duty not to divert business from the company to a competitor.
This often occurs where a director or partner decides to leave
his or her company and start a new, competing venture. The following
are examples of violations of fiduciary duty:
* Soliciting the company's current customers before officially
leaving the company.
* Soliciting new customers for the new, competing venture before
officially leaving the company.
* An employee who solicits current customers for the new venture
to which he or she is planning to work for is violating the duty
of loyalty.
In summary, one must be very careful in planning to depart from
a going enterprise to which he or she owes a fiduciary duty or
duty of loyalty. Consult with an attorney before soliciting customers
or employees to join in a new venture.
Step Two: Plan Ahead to Stay within the Law and Avoid Litigation.
Despite these warnings, the law of Pennsylvania nonetheless
allows an employee to make some preparations to compete upon
termination of employment. In fact, an employee has every right
to compete after leaving the company, subject to any restrictive
covenants the employee may have executed (the validity and enforceability
of which are the subject of its own article). What an employee
cannot do is use the employer's confidential information, solicit
the employer's customers or otherwise directly damage the employer
while he or she is still employed.
The line between fair and unfair conduct when making arrangements
to compete is often blurry. However, use of the employer's assets
to start the new business venture is clearly unacceptable. Customer
lists and requirements, pricing schedules and other tangible
assets are off-limits.
It's equally unacceptable to take a "corporate opportunity" otherwise
available to the employer, and this area is often a subject of
litigation. This is known as the "corporate opportunity doctrine" and
it works in conjunction with doctrines of fiduciary duty and
the duty of loyalty. Essentially, it states that an officer or
director must devote themselves to the corporation and cannot
profit from or take advantage of an opportunity to the exclusion
of their fellow shareholders. Essentially, a business opportunity
presented to an officer or director must be presented to the
corporation. It cannot be seized by the individual. Safe pre-departure
planning includes holding off on making deals with potential
clients who would otherwise have been a potential client of the
former company.
In summary, one cannot work for a company while at the same
time using that company's assets and opportunities to set up
a new, competing company. If your business relationship is on
the rocks, the safe route is to wind up your involvement with
the company before venturing out to compete with it.
[TOP]
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence V. Young was recently appointed
by the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
as the Chairman of a Hearing Committee, a three-lawyer
panel that hears disciplinary complaints against attorneys
licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth. The appointment
will run through the end of 2005.
Lawrence V. Young was recently elected
as the Vice President of the Middle District Bankruptcy
Bar Association at its annual meeting in October 2003.
Andrew M. Paxton was recently elected
to the Board of Directors of The Arc of York County.
Jon C. Countess and Andrew M.
Paxton recently attended a full-day seminar
on Negotiating and Drafting Acquisition Agreements.
Jeffrey L. Rehmeyer II will be teaching
classes for Duquesne University commencing in January.
The classes are Business Ethics for the Executive in the
MBA program.
|
[TOP]
|
|
|
HIPAA Update
By Anne E. Zerbe
|
Most employers and employees are familiar with the term Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"), and the so-called portability provisions that benefit
employees by requiring subsequent employers to accept them into health plans and limit the coverage restrictions by health insurance carriers. However, employers may not be
aware that certain HIPAA regulations, the administrative simplification provisions, contain privacy rules that will apply to most employers and will regulate their administration of
health plans and disclosure of information about plan participants.
Although an employer is specifically excluded from the definition of a health plan under HIPAA, it will be necessary for most employers who sponsor health plans to comply with
the privacy regulations. The extensive privacy rules limit the type of information that may be exchanged between employers and health plans or health insurers and provide civil and
criminal penalties for any covered entity that fails to comply with the privacy regulations. The expansive HIPAA privacy regulations take effect on April 14, 2003, and employers
who sponsor health plans and access medical or financial information of plan participants should be prepared to meet the challenge of ensuring HIPAA compliance.
Employers, while technically exempt from HIPAA's privacy regulations, will need to comply with HIPAA if they are plan sponsors of a group health plan, with limited exceptions.
The "plan sponsor" is an employer in the case of a plan maintained by a single employer, the organization is the plan sponsor in the case of a plan maintained by an employee
organization, and the plan sponsor is the association or other group representing the plan participants in a multi-employer plan. For purposes of this article, the term "employer" will
be used in place of "plan sponsor."
A health plan is defined to mean an individual or group plan that provides or pays the cost of medical care, if the plan has 50 or more participants or is administered by an entity
other than the employer that established and maintained the plan. At this time, it is not clear if the regulations mean that a plan administered by another party subjects the plan to the
privacy regulations if the plan has less than 50 participants.
Under the privacy regulations, a group health plan is responsible to implement policies and procedures to protect Protected Health Information "PHI" of individuals and limit the use
and disclosure of PHI to the minimum amount necessary to carry out the health plan's operations, payment and treatment functions. Generally, HIPAA's privacy regulations will
prevent health plans from legally obtaining information about specific individuals for purposes other than health plan payment or plan operations, and then only under limited
circumstances.
Employers who are plan sponsors and perform certain functions that are closely related to or similar to group health plan functions that often require access to individual's medical
information must comply with HIPAA's privacy regulations. Generally, employers with self-insured group health plans are subject to HIPAA's privacy rules. Employers with fully
insured group health plans may qualify for an exception and avoid compliance, but only if the fully insured plan maintains a completely hands-off approach to the insurance
arrangement.
HIPAA Test--Are You Covered?
Because employers who sponsor health plans with more than 50 or more participants may be covered by the privacy regulations, employers should conduct an analysis of the impact
of HIPAA on the employer and its dealings with a health plan. If an employer maintains a self-insured employee welfare benefit plan or performs some administrative functions
regarding the plan, the employer must comply with all or some of the privacy rules under HIPAA.
Further, employers cannot use PHI for employment-related functions without an authorization from the individual employee. This means that employers may not use PHI, such as
medical records relating to an individual's medical condition received in connection with the plan, to make any employment related decisions affecting the employment of the
individual. The employer must protect the PHI of plan participants and enrollment and dis-enrollment information of participants, which is PHI under HIPAA. This information may
not be used or disclosed for purposes other than treatment, payment or healthcare operations, without authorizations from the individuals.
In summary, the privacy regulations of HIPAA require employers who sponsor health plans to carefully examine their functions as plan sponsors and determine whether or not they
must comply with the privacy regulations. The far-reaching impact of HIPAA and the implications for employers and employees will be the subject of future litigation following the
April 14, 2003 compliance date. Before making final determinations concerning HIPAA coverage and compliance, employers should consult legal counsel.
[TOP]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlights Of The New Federal Tax Act
|
On May 28, 2003, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 became law. Much of this federal tax law applies only to the years 2003 and 2004, after which
provisions in the 2001 Tax Act will again become effective. Nonetheless, the Act contains some significant changes for individuals as well as businesses.
Individuals
The child tax credit increases from $600 to $1,000, which is an acceleration of a scheduled phase-in that was to have occurred between 2005 and 2010. In 2005, the credit will fall to
$700, but will then gradually rise to $1,000 again by 2010 by virtue of the 2001 Act.
The standard deduction for married couples will double to twice the amount of the standard deduction for single taxpayers. Married taxpayers filing a separate return will claim the
same standard deduction as a single person. Similarly, for 2003 and 2004, the upper limit of the 15% income tax bracket for married couples will increase to a dollar amount that is
twice that for a single taxpayer.
For 2003, income levels for the 10% tax bracket will increase to $7,000 for single taxpayers and $14,000 for joint filers. In 2004, these levels of income will be indexed for inflation.
Retroactive to January 1, 2003, the new tax rates for individuals are 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. For transactions taking place from May 6, 2003 to December 31, 2007,
the maximum capital gain tax rate has dropped from 20% to 15%, and from 10% to 5% for lower-income taxpayers.
To reduce the double taxation of corporate earnings, dividends received by an individual shareholder from a domestic or qualified foreign corporation will be taxed like capital gain
income. This means a rate of 15% for most taxpayers and 5% for those at lower-income levels, assuming the stock is held for at least the holding period set by law. Dividends from
certain corporations are not eligible for this new treatment, such as those from tax-exempt charities, farmers' cooperatives, and particular foreign companies.
Businesses
The Act increases the amount of investment that may be deducted immediately by small businesses from $25,000 to $100,000. The amount of this deduction is reduced by the
amount that the cost of the business assets exceeds $400,000. Under prior law, this phase-out of the deduction began at $200,000.
The additional first-year bonus depreciation deduction is increased from 30% to 50% for investments acquired and put into service between May 5, 2003 and January 1, 2005.
Qualifying property still must be brand new, with a class life of 20 years or less.
[TOP]
|
|
|
|
Estate Planning With Long-term Care Insurance
|
Longer life expectancies and the coming surge in the retirement-age population have increased the demand for long-term care, as well as for insurance as one means of paying for
that care. Long-term care encompasses a broad range of services for those with a prolonged illness, disability, or mental disorder. Unlike the focus of traditional medical care
exclusively on certain medical problems, the goal of long-term care is the maintenance of an individual's level of functioning.
Types of Care
The two main types of care are skilled care, provided by medical personnel for medical conditions according to a treatment plan, and personal care. Personal care, sometimes called
custodial care, is assistance with the activities of daily living that can be provided in many settings, including nursing homes, adult day-care centers, or the individual's own home.
Whether the purchase of long-term care insurance makes sense for a particular individual depends on age, health status, overall retirement objectives, and income. As with any type
of insurance, it is critical to understand what is and is not covered among the types of long-term care services that are available. Exclusions and limitations are common. Equally
important is knowing where services are covered. Some policies cover care in any state-licensed facility, but others may specifically include or exclude particular types of facilities.
Key Features
Since the amount of coverage is dictated by the type of service, coverage amounts will vary depending on the service. Most policies have a "total lifetime benefit" for the duration of
a policy. In addition, benefits are often payable up to maximum amounts per day, week, month, or year.
A provision on when benefits are payable, sometimes called a "benefit trigger," is another key feature that can vary significantly among policies. Some states have legislated
benefit-trigger requirements, making it a good idea to check with state insurance departments. Typically, benefits become payable because of the insured's inability to perform a
certain number of the activities of daily living. Policy language on mental incapacity also allows for benefits when the insured fails mental functioning tests. Such a benefit trigger is
especially important for those afflicted with Alzheimer's, even though most states prohibit the outright exclusion of coverage for that disease.
Although they can add to the cost of a policy, there are optional policy provisions that can help to tailor a policy to individual circumstances. Third-party notification authorizes the
insurer to notify a designated third party, such as a relative or friend, if the policy is about to lapse for nonpayment of the premium. A waiver of premium clause allows the insured
to stop paying premiums once he or she is in a nursing home and the insurer has begun to pay benefits. Nonforfeiture benefits return some of the investment in the policy if coverage
is dropped. If an insured has paid premiums for a certain number of years, some policies allow a death benefit to the estate consisting of a refund of premiums, minus any benefits
the company has paid.
Tax Implications
Premiums paid for long-term care insurance are deductible as a medical expense, as long as all medical expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income. Since premiums on average
increase more than tenfold between the ages of 40 and 70, this deduction increases substantially with age. The maximum long-term care premium you can add to your other
deductible medical expenses is based on your age at the end of each tax year.
Employer contributions to long-term care insurance for their employees are tax deductible for the employer, and premium payments are not taxable income to the employees.
Benefits from a long-term care plan are excluded from income up to the lesser of the actual costs incurred or $63,875 per year. The annual limitation will increase with inflation in
future years.
[TOP]
|
| |
| |
| Actual resolution of legal issues depends
upon many factors, including variations of facts and state laws. This newsletter
is not intended to provide legal advice on specific subjects, but rather
to provide insight into legal developments and issues. the reader should
always consult with legal counsel before taking action on matters covered
by this newsletter. |
|