Business Relationship On The Rocks?
Firm Update Estate Planning With Long-term Care Insurance
HIPAA Update  

 

 

Business Relationship On The Rocks?
Plan Ahead To Avoid Liability

by Craig Milsten
 
 

Trust, respect and a shared vision are standard prerequisites among business partners but these lofty ideals sometimes get lost in the course of business. Deadlocks and other conflicts may occur amongst shareholders and partners, leading to an eventual breakup of the corporation or partnership and causing the shareholders or partners to explore new business opportunities. These new opportunities might involve a venture in competition with the current company. Such an undertaking is fraught with danger and the likelihood of litigation looms if one disregards the law. Planning ahead and playing by the rules can help a savvy business person avoid a lawsuit.

Step One: Know the Fiduciary Duties of Directors, Partners and Employees.

The first term with which to become familiar is "fiduciary duty." A fiduciary duty is essentially a duty of loyalty or a duty to act fairly. Every director of a corporation owes a fiduciary duty to the company and every partner owes a fiduciary duty to his or her partners. Employees owe a duty of loyalty to their employers. While an employee's duty of loyalty is not exactly the same as a director's (or a partner's) fiduciary duty, some common scenarios occur when a business divorce is imminent. For example, both an employee and a director or partner owe the company a duty not to divert business from the company to a competitor. This often occurs where a director or partner decides to leave his or her company and start a new, competing venture. The following are examples of violations of fiduciary duty:

* Soliciting the company's current customers before officially leaving the company.

* Soliciting new customers for the new, competing venture before officially leaving the company.

* An employee who solicits current customers for the new venture to which he or she is planning to work for is violating the duty of loyalty.

In summary, one must be very careful in planning to depart from a going enterprise to which he or she owes a fiduciary duty or duty of loyalty. Consult with an attorney before soliciting customers or employees to join in a new venture.

Step Two: Plan Ahead to Stay within the Law and Avoid Litigation.

Despite these warnings, the law of Pennsylvania nonetheless allows an employee to make some preparations to compete upon termination of employment. In fact, an employee has every right to compete after leaving the company, subject to any restrictive covenants the employee may have executed (the validity and enforceability of which are the subject of its own article). What an employee cannot do is use the employer's confidential information, solicit the employer's customers or otherwise directly damage the employer while he or she is still employed.

The line between fair and unfair conduct when making arrangements to compete is often blurry. However, use of the employer's assets to start the new business venture is clearly unacceptable. Customer lists and requirements, pricing schedules and other tangible assets are off-limits.

It's equally unacceptable to take a "corporate opportunity" otherwise available to the employer, and this area is often a subject of litigation. This is known as the "corporate opportunity doctrine" and it works in conjunction with doctrines of fiduciary duty and the duty of loyalty. Essentially, it states that an officer or director must devote themselves to the corporation and cannot profit from or take advantage of an opportunity to the exclusion of their fellow shareholders. Essentially, a business opportunity presented to an officer or director must be presented to the corporation. It cannot be seized by the individual. Safe pre-departure planning includes holding off on making deals with potential clients who would otherwise have been a potential client of the former company.

In summary, one cannot work for a company while at the same time using that company's assets and opportunities to set up a new, competing company. If your business relationship is on the rocks, the safe route is to wind up your involvement with the company before venturing out to compete with it.




[TOP]



Firm Update

Lawrence V. Young was recently appointed by the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as the Chairman of a Hearing Committee, a three-lawyer panel that hears disciplinary complaints against attorneys licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth. The appointment will run through the end of 2005.

Lawrence V. Young was recently elected as the Vice President of the Middle District Bankruptcy Bar Association at its annual meeting in October 2003.

Andrew M. Paxton was recently elected to the Board of Directors of The Arc of York County.

Jon C. Countess and Andrew M. Paxton recently attended a full-day seminar on Negotiating and Drafting Acquisition Agreements.

Jeffrey L. Rehmeyer II will be teaching classes for Duquesne University commencing in January. The classes are Business Ethics for the Executive in the MBA program.



[TOP]



HIPAA Update

By Anne E. Zerbe



Most employers and employees are familiar with the term Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"), and the so-called portability provisions that benefit employees by requiring subsequent employers to accept them into health plans and limit the coverage restrictions by health insurance carriers. However, employers may not be aware that certain HIPAA regulations, the administrative simplification provisions, contain privacy rules that will apply to most employers and will regulate their administration of health plans and disclosure of information about plan participants.

Although an employer is specifically excluded from the definition of a health plan under HIPAA, it will be necessary for most employers who sponsor health plans to comply with the privacy regulations. The extensive privacy rules limit the type of information that may be exchanged between employers and health plans or health insurers and provide civil and criminal penalties for any covered entity that fails to comply with the privacy regulations. The expansive HIPAA privacy regulations take effect on April 14, 2003, and employers who sponsor health plans and access medical or financial information of plan participants should be prepared to meet the challenge of ensuring HIPAA compliance.

Employers, while technically exempt from HIPAA's privacy regulations, will need to comply with HIPAA if they are plan sponsors of a group health plan, with limited exceptions. The "plan sponsor" is an employer in the case of a plan maintained by a single employer, the organization is the plan sponsor in the case of a plan maintained by an employee organization, and the plan sponsor is the association or other group representing the plan participants in a multi-employer plan. For purposes of this article, the term "employer" will be used in place of "plan sponsor."

A health plan is defined to mean an individual or group plan that provides or pays the cost of medical care, if the plan has 50 or more participants or is administered by an entity other than the employer that established and maintained the plan. At this time, it is not clear if the regulations mean that a plan administered by another party subjects the plan to the privacy regulations if the plan has less than 50 participants.

Under the privacy regulations, a group health plan is responsible to implement policies and procedures to protect Protected Health Information "PHI" of individuals and limit the use and disclosure of PHI to the minimum amount necessary to carry out the health plan's operations, payment and treatment functions. Generally, HIPAA's privacy regulations will prevent health plans from legally obtaining information about specific individuals for purposes other than health plan payment or plan operations, and then only under limited circumstances.

Employers who are plan sponsors and perform certain functions that are closely related to or similar to group health plan functions that often require access to individual's medical information must comply with HIPAA's privacy regulations. Generally, employers with self-insured group health plans are subject to HIPAA's privacy rules. Employers with fully insured group health plans may qualify for an exception and avoid compliance, but only if the fully insured plan maintains a completely hands-off approach to the insurance arrangement.

HIPAA Test--Are You Covered?

Because employers who sponsor health plans with more than 50 or more participants may be covered by the privacy regulations, employers should conduct an analysis of the impact of HIPAA on the employer and its dealings with a health plan. If an employer maintains a self-insured employee welfare benefit plan or performs some administrative functions regarding the plan, the employer must comply with all or some of the privacy rules under HIPAA.

Further, employers cannot use PHI for employment-related functions without an authorization from the individual employee. This means that employers may not use PHI, such as medical records relating to an individual's medical condition received in connection with the plan, to make any employment related decisions affecting the employment of the individual. The employer must protect the PHI of plan participants and enrollment and dis-enrollment information of participants, which is PHI under HIPAA. This information may not be used or disclosed for purposes other than treatment, payment or healthcare operations, without authorizations from the individuals.

In summary, the privacy regulations of HIPAA require employers who sponsor health plans to carefully examine their functions as plan sponsors and determine whether or not they must comply with the privacy regulations. The far-reaching impact of HIPAA and the implications for employers and employees will be the subject of future litigation following the April 14, 2003 compliance date. Before making final determinations concerning HIPAA coverage and compliance, employers should consult legal counsel.




[TOP]



Highlights Of The New Federal Tax Act



On May 28, 2003, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 became law. Much of this federal tax law applies only to the years 2003 and 2004, after which provisions in the 2001 Tax Act will again become effective. Nonetheless, the Act contains some significant changes for individuals as well as businesses.

Individuals

The child tax credit increases from $600 to $1,000, which is an acceleration of a scheduled phase-in that was to have occurred between 2005 and 2010. In 2005, the credit will fall to $700, but will then gradually rise to $1,000 again by 2010 by virtue of the 2001 Act.

The standard deduction for married couples will double to twice the amount of the standard deduction for single taxpayers. Married taxpayers filing a separate return will claim the same standard deduction as a single person. Similarly, for 2003 and 2004, the upper limit of the 15% income tax bracket for married couples will increase to a dollar amount that is twice that for a single taxpayer.

For 2003, income levels for the 10% tax bracket will increase to $7,000 for single taxpayers and $14,000 for joint filers. In 2004, these levels of income will be indexed for inflation. Retroactive to January 1, 2003, the new tax rates for individuals are 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. For transactions taking place from May 6, 2003 to December 31, 2007, the maximum capital gain tax rate has dropped from 20% to 15%, and from 10% to 5% for lower-income taxpayers.

To reduce the double taxation of corporate earnings, dividends received by an individual shareholder from a domestic or qualified foreign corporation will be taxed like capital gain income. This means a rate of 15% for most taxpayers and 5% for those at lower-income levels, assuming the stock is held for at least the holding period set by law. Dividends from certain corporations are not eligible for this new treatment, such as those from tax-exempt charities, farmers' cooperatives, and particular foreign companies.

Businesses

The Act increases the amount of investment that may be deducted immediately by small businesses from $25,000 to $100,000. The amount of this deduction is reduced by the amount that the cost of the business assets exceeds $400,000. Under prior law, this phase-out of the deduction began at $200,000.

The additional first-year bonus depreciation deduction is increased from 30% to 50% for investments acquired and put into service between May 5, 2003 and January 1, 2005. Qualifying property still must be brand new, with a class life of 20 years or less.




[TOP]



Estate Planning With Long-term Care Insurance



Longer life expectancies and the coming surge in the retirement-age population have increased the demand for long-term care, as well as for insurance as one means of paying for that care. Long-term care encompasses a broad range of services for those with a prolonged illness, disability, or mental disorder. Unlike the focus of traditional medical care exclusively on certain medical problems, the goal of long-term care is the maintenance of an individual's level of functioning.

Types of Care

The two main types of care are skilled care, provided by medical personnel for medical conditions according to a treatment plan, and personal care. Personal care, sometimes called custodial care, is assistance with the activities of daily living that can be provided in many settings, including nursing homes, adult day-care centers, or the individual's own home.

Whether the purchase of long-term care insurance makes sense for a particular individual depends on age, health status, overall retirement objectives, and income. As with any type of insurance, it is critical to understand what is and is not covered among the types of long-term care services that are available. Exclusions and limitations are common. Equally important is knowing where services are covered. Some policies cover care in any state-licensed facility, but others may specifically include or exclude particular types of facilities.

Key Features

Since the amount of coverage is dictated by the type of service, coverage amounts will vary depending on the service. Most policies have a "total lifetime benefit" for the duration of a policy. In addition, benefits are often payable up to maximum amounts per day, week, month, or year.

A provision on when benefits are payable, sometimes called a "benefit trigger," is another key feature that can vary significantly among policies. Some states have legislated benefit-trigger requirements, making it a good idea to check with state insurance departments. Typically, benefits become payable because of the insured's inability to perform a certain number of the activities of daily living. Policy language on mental incapacity also allows for benefits when the insured fails mental functioning tests. Such a benefit trigger is especially important for those afflicted with Alzheimer's, even though most states prohibit the outright exclusion of coverage for that disease.

Although they can add to the cost of a policy, there are optional policy provisions that can help to tailor a policy to individual circumstances. Third-party notification authorizes the insurer to notify a designated third party, such as a relative or friend, if the policy is about to lapse for nonpayment of the premium. A waiver of premium clause allows the insured to stop paying premiums once he or she is in a nursing home and the insurer has begun to pay benefits. Nonforfeiture benefits return some of the investment in the policy if coverage is dropped. If an insured has paid premiums for a certain number of years, some policies allow a death benefit to the estate consisting of a refund of premiums, minus any benefits the company has paid.

Tax Implications

Premiums paid for long-term care insurance are deductible as a medical expense, as long as all medical expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income. Since premiums on average increase more than tenfold between the ages of 40 and 70, this deduction increases substantially with age. The maximum long-term care premium you can add to your other deductible medical expenses is based on your age at the end of each tax year.

Employer contributions to long-term care insurance for their employees are tax deductible for the employer, and premium payments are not taxable income to the employees. Benefits from a long-term care plan are excluded from income up to the lesser of the actual costs incurred or $63,875 per year. The annual limitation will increase with inflation in future years.




[TOP]
 
 
Actual resolution of legal issues depends upon many factors, including variations of facts and state laws. This newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice on specific subjects, but rather to provide insight into legal developments and issues. the reader should always consult with legal counsel before taking action on matters covered by this newsletter.